A Rake’s Progress

“Obamacide” continues as Obama’s staff reacts to Palin selection.

August 29, 2008 · 9 Comments

Last night, he almost had me.

I listened carefully as Obama delivered his acceptance speech and finally added substance to style, spelled out for voters policies he would implement as president. Of course, no Obama speech would be complete without inspiring oratory, and last night he did not disappoint those who were looking for another emotional fix. 

Obama delivered.

This morning I was reconsidering my views about Obama. With the significant exception of Iraq, his policies are in line with my values and viewpoint. Like many, I have been and continue to be concerned about his readiness to lead our nation in times of international crises. But I have been ready to say that on balance, Obama is a risk worth taking. The upside is greater than the downside. If he succeeded as president, we Americans would be better off than under a McCain administration in areas such as health care, taxes, jobs, women’s rights, civil rights, and the environment.

As I was mulling this over today, McCain stood in a hall in Dayton, Ohio, and announced his choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate. Like many people, I thought this was vintage McCain, the Maverick McCain that we used to know making a smart personal and political choice. Similarly, I wondered about the background of this newcomer he was bringing onto the national stage.

There’s a lot that Sarah Palin has to prove to voters about her readiness to be vice president – and possibly president if something happens to McCain. But she also deserves our respect for what she has accomplished in her young life. She’s been a reformer, someone who has challenged the status quo. Within the context of her beliefs, she has been “the change.” She is also a mother of five children, and one is on his way to Iraq to serve his country.

I certainly don’t expect the Obama campaign to endorse Sarah Palin. But last night I thought I heard Barack Obama eloquently appeal for a new kind of politics, one that transcended party affiliation and ideology. While Obama was speaking, John McCain ran an ad congratulating Obama for his historic achievement as the first African-American presidential nominee by a major political party. I thought that was a class act from McCain. That was exactly the kind of civility in politics that Obama says we need.

I cannot say the same about Obama’s staff as they immediately tore into Sarah Palin, literally trying to wipe her off the political scene as a nobody. Here’s the first reaction to Palin by Obama spokesman Bill Burton, as reported in the New York Times:

“Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency,” Bill Burton, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, said in a statement. “Governor Palin shares John McCain’s commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush’s failed economic policies — that’s not the change we need, it’s just more of the same.”

Doesn’t that sound like more of the same? Doesn’t that sound like the old politics? Does that really sound like the change we need?

There was a fleeting moment for the Obama campaign to show the graciousness to Palin that McCain extended to Obama. “Welcome to the fray, Governor Palin! We look forward to discussing America’s future with you and Senator McCain.”

Instead it was a moment in which the Obama campaign showed its true, ruthless colors — the same doublespeak and nastiness that has given so many of us who supported Hillary Clinton a raw, angry feeling about the real Obama.

There’s a saying in management circles that “the fish rots from the head.” It was Bill Burton speaking, but it was on behalf of Barack Obama. The would-be commander-in-chief has to take responsibility for what his staff says. And while I might have admired Obama last night and considered how on issues we often share the same position, his staff is intent on committing “Obamacide.” Through their ugly comments and partisan attacks, they are actually killing the candidate they are supposed to be championing.

As I wrote a few weeks ago, “Every time they speak or write, they take another vote from Obama and give it to McCain. Is this this politics of change Obama really meant? They are assassinating their own candidate without lifting a gun.”

If Obama actually wins, his campaign staff — people like Burton, Axelrod, Messina, Plouffe — are not going to disappear. They will become the core of Obama’s White House staff. It is the prospect of having these men in charge of my country that gives me the greatest hesitation in supporting Obama. With them on the front lines of our government, you can kiss goodbye “the change,” the civility and non-partisanship that Obama promised last night in his acceptance speech.

For a biography of Sarah Palin, click here.

Categories: Barack Obama · Democrats · Hillary Clinton · Hillary Clinton Quarterly · Joe Biden · John McCain · News · Politics · Presidential Campaign · Republicans
Tagged: , , , , , ,

9 responses so far ↓

  • TA // August 29, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    I was very depressed about the entire sham Dem Convention roll call etc and all this “Obama, Obama, Obama…” as I sincerely don’t think he is the right choice for America. I was ready to give my vote to The Green Party and then McCain gave me change I can believe in!!!! I am so excited now!!!!

  • Brian // August 29, 2008 at 10:43 pm

    I think it was a real great move by McCain to pick her she seems like someone that would change the face of Republicans and put Dems in shame. I’ve been watching videos of her and reading about her accomplishments and also her life. She is right for the job.

  • Donna // August 29, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    I am a die-hard Hillary supporter (along with 18 Mil. others). I am a huge Bill Clinton fan. I have a laundry list of reasons why I will never vote for Obama:

    The DNC threw out the democratic process and the fair reflection of the voters, mysogny and race baiting by the in-the-tank-for-Obama-MSM, Obamabots’ & Obama’s: reverse racism of both Bill & Hillary, talking up Reagan’s legacy and ignoring Bill Clinton’s, accusing Hillary of saying she wanted Obama assasinated when she talked about RFK being in the primaries until June, childishly disrespecting Hillary by flipping her off and dusting her off his shoulders in his stump speeches, taking Hillary’s votes in Michigan when he wasn’t even on the ballot, suppressing a revote in Florida & Michigan, stopping the full vote, and then finally, not picking her as his vice president. SHAME ON OBAMA and his FREAKING OBAMYSOGYNISTS. And all the while Donna Brazile, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid sat on their hands and didn’t do a freaking thing.

    Obama lacks the fundamental human attributes and person needs. I want a president that will act with honor, respect and civility. He and his his Chicago thugs tried to rip the Clinton legacy apart and that I will NEVER forgive. Period.

    The DNC and left side destroyed the entire democratic party. I am voting for McCain/Palin & proud of it.

  • kelly // August 29, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    if you want to vote for Clinton why in heaven’s name would you vote for McCain? I don’t understand why the Hilary voters are so outraged. If Hiliary had one, the Obama voters would have been on board despite her best efforts to tear him apart. Why hold these grudges and carry them over to an election that will determine the future of this country? You should really examine this race closer. do you even know what McCain and Palin stand for? if you wanted Hiliary for her values and political beliefes you cannot possibly want these two.

  • Donna // August 30, 2008 at 2:45 am

    Kelly — I pretty much laid it out for you why I would never vote for Obama. It’s just like Bill Clinton said, candidate X 100% your views, but won’t deliver, candidate Y 50% your views, and will deliver.

    Obama has so much baggage, Rev. Wright, Father Phleger, William Ayers… This entire Annenburge Challenge issue will be quite interesting. I don’t trust Obama. I trust John McCain. I believe in my country over party and my party pissed all over my candidate. Obama has made no effort to heal the primary wounds.

    Outrage = stealing someone else’s votes when they are not even on the ballot.

  • Chris // August 30, 2008 at 2:56 am

    Um, well they are right. Sarah Palin is unqualified to be Vice-President; especially for a 72 year old man who has had two fights with cancer.

    For the Hillary supporters shopping their votes to McCain, please don’t come back crying when his anti-women policies and Supreme Court appointees roll back Womens’ rights to the 1800s.

  • nextgen08 // August 30, 2008 at 8:57 am

    Let’s be honest here. Most people that are saying they won’t vote for Sen. Obama because Hillary should have one, and the people who are wrongly accusing Obama for the medias misogyny, were never going to vote for Obama. Never. This was never about the issues for them, this was about a symbol. The symbol of the first female president. They abandoned the Republican party for Hillary, and when it didn’t work out, they used their “independence” to try to pressure Obama to pick Hillary for his Vice President. After Obama picked Sen. Biden, and Hillary and Bill stood behind them, as did the vast majority of Democrats, they realized they couldn’t get what they wanted, so they are now jumping ship again to support Palin. Again, this isn’t about Palin or her incredible inexperience, it’s about a symbol. I can understand the power of that symbol for a segment of the population on the precipice of equality, that never seem to reach it. I can understand the frustration, but this isn’t about Hillary, Palin, or Obama. It’s about that symbol, and it’s not about the policies of the candidates. Anyone that was for Hillary could never support Palin for V.P. Palin may be a woman, but she is also a misogynist. Obama cares more about women’s issues than Palin does, and he is a man. what does that say about the Republican Pick for V.P.? It says they are trying to divide the women from the Democrats. A party that has stood beside women for over a hundred years. A party that has been at the forefront of every major civil rights issue in our country since the Civil War. Throw your hat in with McCain/Palin if you want, but just having ovaries isn’t going magically make her your advocate. Clearly Obama is the choice for women in the U.S., as well as for middle class, Hispanics, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Homosexual Americans, and any other group that has known discrimination. Vote for McCain if you feel you need to, but don’t have any illusions about what that vote, and a McCain presidency will get you.

  • No Change // August 30, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    [...] read an article the other day about how the writer, “Almost”, gave their support to Obama, but [...]

  • Todd // September 4, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Chris, no disrespect but you DO know that it was the Republicans who GAVE women the right to vote in the first place…right? I mean I have no dog in this hunt but history is history. The GOP was the first party to support women’s sufferage and paid to defend Susan B. Anthony at her trial. They authored the 19th Amendment and passed it despite Democrats fillbustering the vote to try to kill it. The first woman ever elected to Congress was a Republican, the first woman to run for President of a major party was not Hillary, you’re off by 44 years. A Republican woman from Maine ran in 1964. And now Palin.

    You are entitled to your opinion but base it on some facts.

Leave a Comment